For Ultralight Hikers, Water Bladders Are Better Than Bottles. Here’s Why.
The Smartwater bottle and Sawyer Squeeze filter combo is a mainstay of the ultralight hiking kit. The bottles are cheap, replaceable, and lightweight. The screw-on filter means you can collect water and filter on the move. In comparison, my preferred water-carrying system, the once-ubiquitous water bladder and hose, is now considered tedious, fragile, and—worst of all—heavy. Let’s bust some myths to explain why I still carry it.
Myth #1: Bladders Are Heavy
First, the weight. I often hear ultralight hikers explain that water bladders are simply too heavy to consider as an option. And if you’re looking at something like a 1.5-liter Camelbak that weighs 7 ounces, that’s fair. But today’s lightweight bladder systems are nearly as weight-efficient as using disposable bottles. A one-liter Smartwater bottle weighs 1.2 ounces, while a three-liter Platypus bladder and hose hits the scale at 3.8 ounces.
Continue reading to learn more, written by Nathan Pipenberg.
March 20, 2025
Nathan Pipenberg
Nathan’s work focuses on travel, the outdoors, and environmental issues. His work has been featured in publications like Outside Online, Backpacker Magazine, Mountain Flyer, and REI.
その他のコンテンツを見る
メディア
A lightweight backpacking filter like the Sawyer Squeeze catches bacteria and parasites, which is sufficient in the US and other infrastructure-rich countries.
メディア
This summer, try spraying your socks, shoes, shorts, and even gardening gloves our most effective tick (and mosquito) repellent for clothing.
メディア
If you want a compact, lightweight, reliable way to filter your water, look no further than the Sawyer Squeeze.
チームから
スクワッドメンバーやアンバサダー、ブランドパートナー、ソーヤーチームなど、私たちのコミュニティとのキャンプファイヤーでの会話。
